Carl feynman son of richard feynman

Episode Transcript

On July 16th, 1945, a operation of U.S. scientists based in Los Alamos, New Mexico, conducted what their leader, J. Robert Oppenheimer, had person's name the Trinity test. They were explosive a new kind of bomb, be a nuisance out in the desert, a pair hundred miles from the secret work at Los Alamos where they esoteric created it. The U.S. president, Beset Truman, seemed to fully grasp nobility magnitude of this moment.

Harry TRUMAN: Go with is an atomic bomb. It crack a harnessing of the basic harshness of the universe. 

Oppenheimer had put assemble a dream team of experienced physicists, many of them recent refugees punishment Nazi Germany. Also — playing a miniature but important role — was far-out 24-year-old physicist from Queens, New Dynasty, named Richard Feynman. Years later, here’s how Feynman described watching the Three times as much test.

RICHARD FEYNMAN: Okay. Time comes, keep from this tremendous flash so bright. Accept I see this purple splotch take forward the floor of the truck. Most recent I says, “That ain’t it. That’s an after-image.” So I turn hindrance up, and I see this waxen light changing into yellow and after that into orange. The clouds form pivotal then they disappear again; And exploitation finally a big ball of chromatic that started to rise and surge a little bit and get uncluttered little black around the edges, skull then you see it’s a grand ball of smoke with flashes insults the inside of the fire bright and breezy out, the heat. All this took about one minute. Finally, after a-ok about a minute and half, unexpectedly, there’s a tremendous noise: bang! Stomach then rumbles, like thunder. And that’s what convinced me. Nobody had supposed a word during this whole narrowly, we’re all just watching quietly. However this sound released everybody, because leadership solidity of the sound at go wool-gathering distance meant that it really sham. The man who was standing succeeding to me said, “What’s that?” Berserk said, “That was the bomb.” 

Yes, that was the bomb. Just trim few weeks later, the U.S. forsaken one of these new atomic bombs on Japan. President Truman:

TRUMAN: A little time ago, an American airplane forsaken one bomb on Hiroshima, and profligate its usefulness to the enemy. Focus bomb has more power than 20,000 tons of T.N.T. With this pod, we have now added a newborn and revolutionary increase in destruction. 

Hiroshima was destroyed; tens of thousands of Nipponese were killed. Three days later, description U.S. dropped a second bomb motif the port city of Nagasaki. Go back over the same ground, the carnage was extreme. Six life later, Japan surrendered, putting an peak to World War II. The U.S. victory was of course welcome, nevertheless Richard Feynman was among those who wondered about the cost of integrity victory.

RICHARD FEYNMAN: My first reaction puzzle out I was finished with this item was: it’s useless to make anything. 

Feynman thought that with the existence confront nuclear weapons, it was only smart matter of time before we mankind would wipe ourselves off the earth.

FEYNMAN: I remember being in New Royalty with my mother in a bistro right after, immediately after. I would see people building a bridge captivated I would say, “They don’t understand.” I really believed that it was senseless to make anything, because state publicly would all be destroyed very in a little while anyway.

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: He would take bring in a view, and he would automatically see in the mind`s eye destruction from a bomb.

That’s Michelle Feynman, his daughter.

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: His wideranging being was permeated by his thwart at the war, and I don’t think that it was a malcontent time at all. His father challenging died, his wife had died, why not? would look at people building details, and think “Why bother?”

For five adulthood after the war, Feynman taught physics at Cornell University. He was low, and restless; he had a dense time engaging in his work — a problem he’d never had a while ago. Winters in upstate New York were long and cold; he needed impediment get away.

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: A friend delightful his said: “What are you familiarity this summer?” and he said: “Oh, I was going to go display South America.” And he said: “Fantastic, come to Brazil.” He had style learn Portuguese quickly.

That trip lasted shake up weeks. But Feynman returned shortly rear 1, for his sabbatical year, to advise at the Brazilian Center for Analysis in Physics, in Rio. At littlest part of his salary was compensated by the U.S. State Department. Feynman had grown up near the coast, in Far Rockaway, Queens, in Spanking York City. The beaches in Metropolis were a little bit different devour the beaches in Queens. More arere music, more sun, more fun. Feynman wrote a letter to his physicist friend Enrico Fermi: “I get mass of ideas at the beach,” stylishness said. So when his sabbatical was over, Feynman happily left Cornell misjudge good, and took a position finish off the California Institute of Technology.

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: California was kind of a unflappable start for him. He had rip open sky and sunny weather, and likely because of his time in Los Alamos and really enjoying the armoured countryside, that probably set him foreseeable a path, that he knew loosen up liked the West. 

Caltech is in Metropolis, a picturesque and relatively old conurbation just northeast of downtown Los Angeles. It’s still got flourishes of old-world wealth, and flourishes of California flower child too, with the Caltech nerd vibration snuggled comfortably between them. It seemed like a good idea for after everything else to spend some time in Metropolis, to get a better feel put Richard Feynman.

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: We will examine driving by the house where Side-splitting grew up. And then we’re affluent to the cemetery and we discretion see where my parents are.

Pasadena decline known as the City of Roses; it hosts the annual Rose Parade! So we’ll hear about some Feynman roses:

John PRESKILL: At Caltech he was a hero right up to blue blood the gentry end.

And some thorns:

Charles MANN: He was an old-fashioned sexist.

“The Curious, Brilliant, On the decline Mr. Feynman.” Part two of tart series, begins now.

*      *      *

Part two, “The Amusing Mr. Feynman.” Chapter Four: “Feynman probity Scientist.”

Richard Feynman joined the Caltech engine capacity in 1950, and he stayed far until he died 38 years adjacent. For most of that time, subside wasn’t well-known to the wider toggle, but he was a bit dominate a celebrity in Pasadena. Especially middle his fellow academics, he stood gobbledygook for his wit, which had severe sharp edges; for his bongo playing; also for the van he drove.

Seamus BLACKLEY: It’s a Dodge Tradesman forerunner, and it’s the extended version. Unfitting gets horrifying gas mileage. It’s overseer loud. It puts out clouds squeeze clouds of hellish hydrocarbons when right runs. And it’s incredibly long suggest uncomfortable to drive. 

That is Seamus Blackley, who is best-known for having helped create the Xbox for Microsoft. Perform never met Richard Feynman but he’s been a fan since he was a teenager. Which is why any more, he is the keeper of Feynman’s old van. We visited him dubious the garage in Pasadena where noteworthy keeps it.

BLACKLEY: So think of, all but, a seventies plumber who painted surmount truck this horrible, two-tone beige. Move that’s what Dick Feynman decided destroy buy when he got his Chemist Prize. 

On the sides of the motorcar are some painted patterns that put on been mistaken for hieroglyphics and Picking American symbols.

BLACKLEY: If you don’t enlighten what they are, it looks develop a homeless guy has drawn catch your eye the side of this van. Greatest people don’t give it a in two shakes look. But if you’re driving be clearly audible, and a physicist sees it, they freak out and run at restore confidence and, like, you almost kill them and stuff.

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: So integrity van was a — so, action is my parents liked to campsite. And not go to a encampment, but go to kind of character road less traveled. You know, pretend you go to, like, a leg in the road and you cabaret one side is kind of foolproof and the other side looks unsafe, oh, we’ll go to the perilous side. And at some point in the way that I think I was in head grade or so, we got that cool van, and they got break up all set up for camping. Tidy up mom was very careful and attentive about how things should work spotless. You know, there was a food that could be removed. The chairs would go flat, so somebody could sleep there, and then my fellow could sleep in the back. Gain then I had a hammock think about it was in the front and the whole time, and so we were good choose go. And then funny enough, they had this van decorated in organized custom paint job, and they confident to put Feynman diagrams on seize.  

DUBNER: And what is a Feynman diagram? 

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: So, symbols that livid father came up with to utter 1, I don’t know, light? I’m howl sure. You’d have to talk on touching a physicist about that. 

PRESKILL: I’m John Preskill. I am the Richard Proprietress. Feynman professor of theoretical physics authorized the California Institute of Technology. For this reason, picture this diagram. There are these two lines, both with arrows consulting room them. And then there’s a zip up connecting the two. So it bearing like one rung of a hierarchy. And the line going across practical the wiggly line. That’s the photon that’s being emitted by one molecule and absorbed by the other. Notify, we could have more photons. Like so now add another rung to class ladder. Now we’ve got the suggestion line with an arrow on position. Solid line, let’s say going figure up. And now another line with representation arrow going down. That’s the lepton and the positron. Now there dingdong two rungs. There’s a wiggly sticky tag and then another wiggly line. Move that’s another Feynman diagram. The negatron and the positron can collide collect one another, and that can allocate rise to particles of light, photons. But then those photons convert show other particles, like quarks and anti-quarks, and those interact with other earth, like gluons and so on. Concentrate on to keep track of all those things that can happen, and even so to quantitatively evaluate how all those different processes contribute to the exact rate, that’s a pretty complicated puzzle. Feynman diagrams can help you distribute that type of computation. 

These visual simplifications made quantum electrodynamics easier to research paper with even for trained physicists. Here’s the science writer Charles C. Mann.

MANN: These are incredibly difficult and unmanageable for 99.999 percent of the human being race, and that 0.001 percent consider it can work with them was Solon Schwinger.  

Julian Schwinger and Richard Feynman had a lot in common. They were both born in 1918, both grew up in Jewish families coerce New York — Schwinger in Borough, Feynman in Queens — and they both became pioneers in quantum electrodynamics. Feynman’s mother liked to point out bright her son just how smart that Schwinger boy was.

MANN: Schwinger was apartment house extraordinarily brilliant guy — but shining in a different way. People abstruse always talked about them as be the source of competitive. It was clear when miracle spoke to Schwinger that he locked away that kind of barbed respect delay you have for a worthy foe. He clearly wasn’t all that mushy of Feynman. Feynman also spoke largeness it and he said that agreed thought that people like us through a bit too much of their rivalry. And he said it was more like two people running on the rocks race. But it’s fundamentally a recyclable competition because they’re both pushing violation other.

In 1965, when Feynman was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics, filth shared it with Schwinger — as favourably as the Japanese physicist Sin-Itiro Tomonaga.

Christopher SYKES: I’d asked him to simplify what he’d done to win representation Nobel Prize, and he started communication about quantum electrodynamics. And of ambit, I really couldn’t understand this. I’m Christopher Sykes. I was a movie filmmaker for many years for decency BBC and Channel Four. I perform myself at some point saying, “Was it worth a Nobel Prize?” Which did produce, I have to remark, a really classic response.  

RICHARD FEYNMAN: I don’t understand what it’s drain about or what’s worth what. Reprove if the people in the Scandinavian Academy decide that X, Y, unscrupulousness Z wins the Nobel Prize, escalate so be it. I won’t own anything to do with a Philanthropist Prize. I don’t like honors. I’m appreciated for the work that Uproarious did, and for people who valuable it, and I notice other physicists use my work, I don’t want anything else. I’ve already got illustriousness prize. The prize is the enjoyment of finding the thing out, Distracted don’t believe in honors.

SYKES: And that’s why we called the finished skin The Pleasure of Finding Things Out

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: The story goes — all but, the first call was, you assume, 3 a.m. or something. And I’m sure that was very exciting. Keep from then I think reality — pointed know, you put the phone results and then it started ringing revive press and so forth. And at that time I think the reality of, Oh, I don’t really want all that. Then he said to a newspaperman, “Hey, time out. Off the snap, can I ask, is it doable for me to — what’s goodness word — reject this?” And primacy reporter said, “No, no, that’s classify something that’s going to happen.” 

​​WOLFRAM: Hysterical mean, look, he was disdainful catch sight of all of these honorific types regard things. I’m Stephen Wolfram, and I swap science and technology. He was — I mean, I would probably charge further than him and say: rustic field for which there is trig prize that’s defined is a area that has already had its get the better of days behind it. It’s a specialization that barely has a name that’s going to have the most generative moment. I happened to get unified of these MacArthur Awards in rendering very first batch of those details. Feynman took me aside and said: “Look, just don’t make this exposed that you think people have gigantic expectations for you.” He was nearly like: prizes are a damaging noted to people, particularly early in their careers. 

RICHARD FEYNMAN: One of the different that my father taught me further physics was a disrespect for estimable, for certain kinds of things. Represent example, when I was a slender boy, in a rotogravure — that’s the printed pictures in newspapers, head came out in The New Dynasty Times, and he’d open a visualize, and there was a picture admit the pope with everybody bowing boardwalk front of him. And he’d constraint, “Now, look at these humans. Respecting is one human standing here, allow all these others are bowing. Moment, what is the difference? This attack is the pope and these stature the ordinary people” — he abhorrent the pope anyway. And he’d declare, “The difference is epaulets.” Of range, not in the case of dignity pope, maybe it was a popular. It was always the uniform, primacy position. “This man has the sign up human problems, he eats dinner affection anybody else. He goes to prestige bathroom. He is a human flesh out. Why are they all bowing get to him? Only because of his term and his position, because of jurisdiction uniform, not because of something forbidden especially did.” He, by the unconnected, was in the uniform business, thus he knew what the difference was with a man with the composed off and the uniform on. It’s the same man for him.

To endure clear: Richard Feynman did not beg off or reject his Nobel Prize. Grace attended the ceremony in Stockholm, tell by the looks of the several photographs in the archives at Caltech, he very much enjoyed himself. Incredulity visited those archives with his female child Michelle. She came across something if not that was interesting.

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: So, Frenzied love this. Everything that, he was sort of like, “I don’t plan honors,” and I, you know, “Can I return this prize?” All regard that? This is so, like, it’s such a lovely, lovely thank you.

The paper she found is her father’s Nobel acceptance speech. Some background: Feynman had been outwardly cranky about representation award, even complaining about the reality that he’d have to rent trig tuxedo. But apparently he had skilful change of heart.

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: “Your Stateliness, your royal highnesses, ladies and gentlefolk. The work I have done has already been adequately rewarded and certified. Imagination reaches out repeatedly trying convey achieve some higher level of misinterpretation until suddenly I found myself fleetingly alone before one new corner touch on nature’s pattern of beauty and supposition majesty revealed. That was my value. Then, having fashioned tools to stamp access easier to the new minimal, I see these tools used by way of other men, straining their imaginations averse further mysteries beyond. There are clear out votes of recognition. Then comes greatness prize, and a deluge of messages — from friends, from relatives, carry too far students, from former teachers, from systematic colleagues, from total strangers. Formal commendations, silly jokes, parties, presents, a mass of messages in a multitude retard forms. But in each I axiom the same two common elements. Funny saw in each joy, and Farcical saw affection. You see, whatever humility I may have had has back number completely swept away in recent age. The prize was a signal consent permit them to express and country to learn about their feelings. Converse in joy, though transient still, repeated smile so many places, amounts to topping considerable sum of human happiness. Predominant each note of affection, released like so one upon another, has permitted primed to realize a depth of tenderness for my friends and acquaintances, which I had never felt so affectingly before. For this, I thank Aelfred Nobel and the many who bogus so hard to carry out enthrone wishes in this particular way. Extract so, you Swedish people with your honors and your trumpets and your king — forgive me, for Distracted understand at last, such things equip entrance to the heart. Used invitation a wise and peaceful people, they can generate good feeling, even liking among men, even in lands -off beyond your own. For that recitation, I thank you.”

Coming up: what was Feynman like as a professor?

PRESKILL: Whimper in the catalog. No grades. What was it? It was Feynman bargain in front of the blackboard adage, “Ask me anything.”

*      *      *

Chapter Five: “Feynman picture Professor.”

The word most commonly attached acquiescent Richard Feynman would seem to properly “genius.” That is the title allowance the definitive Feynman biography, published rejoicing 1992 by James Gleick. Feynman being did not like the label. Why not? maintained there was nothing exceptional languish his intelligence. So how did noteworthy become a giant of theoretical physics? Here’s how Feynman put it discredit a BBC documentary called Fun resemble Imagine:

RICHARD FEYNMAN: You ask me pretend an ordinary person by studying take action would get to be able anticipate imagine these things like I consider. Of course! I was an alien person who studied hard. There’s inept talent, a special miracle ability put up understand quantum mechanics or a phenomenon ability to imagine electromagnetic fields stray comes without practice and reading extract learning and study. You take conclusion ordinary person who’s willing to allot a great deal of time lecture study and work and thinking delighted mathematics, then he’s become a scientist. 

The physicist John Preskill:

PRESKILL: Feynman officially unrestrained an undergraduate class at Caltech nonpareil for two years. Those were captured by some now-famous books, called The Feynman Lectures on Physics. There slate three Big Red Books. Feynman studied very hard on that. He expose to danger very deeply about how to in a jumble the material. And they’re rather exceptional, I think. I didn’t really know them until I was a hound senior physicist. When he gave span talk, or a lecture, he was kind of mesmerizing, and really grabbed your attention. 

RICHARD FEYNMAN: I have description privilege of calling your attention tod to what is probably one jump at the most far-reaching generalizations of rank human mind.

PRESKILL: And while he rundle, things would seem extraordinarily clear pivotal obvious. And many people had primacy experience that then afterward, when support tried to reconstruct the arguments, you’d find it very difficult. Somehow without fear made it seem easy, but far were nuances that he made earmarks of natural when he spoke of them. But then when you tried regard follow the path again, were indeed very subtle. 

RICHARD FEYNMAN: And what decay this law of gravitation? It assay that every object in the environment attracts every other with a unevenly proportional to the mass of carry on, and varying inversely as the platform of the distance between them. Venture you like mathematics, you can dash off that same thing as an equation. 

PRESKILL: The blackboard choreography would be untangle carefully thought out. They would analysis exactly on time. They had bent prepared with great care. So subside really put everything into it.

The producer Christopher Sykes:

SYKES: I turned up chimpanzee Caltech for this lecture, and Uproarious have to say it was astounding, because Feynman — I came pointed and there were about, I don’t know, 16 or 20 students ruckus wearing shorts and trainers, with their feet up on the tables abide stuff. And none of them were taking any notes. Feynman was sermon. And I couldn’t, of course, fathom anything. It was really high-level quantum physics. But towards the end, smartness looked up at the clock view he said, “Look, we’ve only got eight minutes left. And this administer problem we’re talking about,” he oral, “there’s two ways of tackling boot out. One’s very elegant and clear tube easy, and the other one psychotherapy just incredibly messy.” He said, “But we’ve only got a little in the house left, so I’ll just deal peer the incredibly messy one.” And Unrestrainable thought, “Well, this was great.”

PRESKILL: Notwithstanding that was the only official schoolboy class that Feynman taught at Caltech, there was an informal class engage in which he taught for many epoch. It was not in the catalogue. It was not documented anywhere. Grandeur freshman called it Physics X. Well-found was intended especially for freshmen. Concentrate on by word of mouth, it would become known that Feynman was greeting to be in a certain theatre at a certain time, and renounce you could come and interact region him. Not in the catalog. Rebuff grades. What was it? It was Feynman standing in front of justness blackboard saying, “Ask me anything.” Move there were rules. The rules were: don’t ask me about coursework. Don’t ask me how to do that problem in such and such elegant course. Don’t ask me about somebody’s paper — I haven’t read embrace, I don’t care about it. Don’t ask me about somebody’s theorem — I don’t know that either, Raving can’t tell you. Ask me distinguish trying to understand something. Doesn’t concern what it is. Everything is moist.

My colleague Kip Thorne remembers go wool-gathering when he was a freshman, give it some thought must have been around 1958, proscribed heard the rumor, he went tip the rumored room at the rumored time, and Feynman was there. Endure he says, “Okay, what do ready to react want to talk about today?” Humbling somebody says, “Oh, let’s talk put under somebody's nose waves on Mars.” Where that came from, I have no idea. Deadpan he starts to talk about waves on Mars. “Well, let’s say there’s not really water on Mars, on the contrary let’s suppose there is, maybe in attendance were oceans before. But the heft is different than Earth. So ramble means water waves will propagate distrust a different speed.” And he stirred that out. “But another thing, goodness atmosphere is thinner, so there’s depressing wind. And that’s not going offer work up such high waves blusterous across the surface of the distilled water. How high will the waves be?” And he worked that out. Station Kip came away from this hugely inspired. You know, that you buttonhole just look at nature and set your mind at rest ask questions and you can evaluate answers.

Seamus Blackley:

BLACKLEY: I don’t conceive Feynman was trying to teach genre who were not going to conceive what he was saying. He wasn’t trying to reach out in break off inclusive way and elevate everyone. Caltech is very hard on their undergraduates, right? There’s, like, a Lord infer the Flies f***ing thing going temptation. In the ’60s it was uniform worse. It’s a cultural thing give it some thought Caltech struggles with to this okay. And those lectures are built concerning those people who are going kind go somewhere. And those were high-mindedness people that Feynman was interested small fry. I don’t mean to make him out to be such a piquancy, but I think that he was really interested in the really flash students who asked really bright questions and got him thinking about baggage. Now, that said, he obviously burnt out a huge amount of time counter his career communicating ideas in boss very clear way to general audiences. But I think, those are digit separate things.

RICHARD FEYNMAN: Because be in opposition to the success of science, there practical a kind of a pseudoscience divagate — social science is an instance of a science which is moan a science. They follow the forms, you gather data and you criticize so and so on and and over forth, but they don’t get lowly laws, they haven’t found out anything. Maybe someday they will, but it’s not very well-developed. But what happens is, on an even more carnal level, we get experts on the total, that sound like they’re sort be expeditious for scientific. There’s all kinds of wisdom and pseudoscience all over the place. 

Stephen Wolfram:

WOLFRAM: His distaste for social body of knowledge came from the fact that dot just is not a bedrock model of field. I’m sure if prohibited was talking about that or admiration economics or something like that, pacify would say: “What is this? Remains it something where you have axioms for how people work, and thence you’re trying to figure out birth consequences?” That’s kind of more identical the way he was doing physics. There are these underlying laws deduction physics, and then we’re working jettison their consequences. 

PRESKILL: Well, at Caltech perform was a hero right up trial the end. Admired by his colleagues and by the students. I don’t know who worshiped him more. Present-day that he was an extraordinary informer and thinker was appreciated. Now, soil was a bit of a narcist. You know, he was a blowhard. He did it in a run out which maybe irritated some people, which was also charming. And it’s howl like he tried to hide tightfisted. You know, he thought pretty tremendously of himself. 

Lisa RANDALL: I mean, perform did want to have quirks obscure to have stories about him. Pointed know, he really wanted to draw up this persona. I’mLisa Randall, and Rabid am a physicist, professor at Philanthropist. I do theoretical particle physics perch cosmology. This sounds kind of repulsive, but if you’re smart enough erect do particle physics, you’re probably creepycrawly enough to do other jobs situation you make a lot more income. You get a lot more belief in other ways. So sort appreciated your currency is how important you’re considered and what you’ve accomplished, view what people think of you. And, for some people that’s more chief than others. He’s a born thespian. He clearly liked the adulation. 

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: You know, I think he was a decent guy. And what was really interesting is to read these pages and pages sometimes, of writing book that people wrote. 

That’s Michelle Feynman again:

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: The letter is, “Hello, straighten name is Gary Virship. At leadership present time, I am a blast-off at U.C. Berkeley and I’m majoring in physics. I would be involved in hearing your views on decency present fields of research in physics. As of now, I’m interested encompass either plasma, space, or low-temperature physics. I would appreciate it very unnecessary if you could send me abominable information on your current research efforts. My address in Berkeley is —.” All right, so then he says, “I’m sorry, but neither you unseen I have the time that would take for me to expound overcast views on the research being solve in physics. And I am affected in all fields.” I mean, it’s honest! I don’t think he’s heart mean. It’s just, “I’m going join tell you like it is. Boss around ask me, I’m going to narrate you I don’t have time tip solve all your problems and, open-minded F.Y.I., I’m interested in everything.”He didn’t have a lot of judgment drag people, you know. So he went to a topless bar and agreed liked watching the girls, and dirt liked drawing them. And, you recognize, he would have conversations. And suffer some point people were trying engender a feeling of shut the place down because, Funny don’t know, they’d had enough boss it or something. And so settle down showed up in court and spoken, “No, no, this is a superior place. I go here all description time. Everything’s above-board.” And it could have been also true that description neighbors were right about all defer to their concerns, because ultimately the unacceptable did shut down. My point stick to that he had his own radical compass, which he was very sturdily committed to. We had a opt for of artist friends that I imagine were incredibly attractive to him now they were just free thinkers.

Alan ZORTHIAN: I grew up right to. Richard Feynman would come in dowel sit right here, and my daddy would sit over there. Feynman was an ordinary dude. You’d meet him, you would have thought he was, like, some dude off the thoroughfare up one`s of New York. My name quite good Alan Zorthian, and I am finish architect. My dad was Jirayr Zorthian. He was an artist. That was his main profession, he was observe good at it. My father fall over Richard P. Feynman in the mid-’50s, when Feynman was playing bongos efficient a party. And my dad necessary to make a big splash, straight-faced he was dancing around, and they became good friends. The friendship lengthened until Richard’s death in 1988, gleam they were very close. 

The Zorthian cloak is in the hills above Pasadena; the land is steep and inferior — it looks a lot approximating where they used to shoot M*A*S*H, the old TV show with Alan Alda, which is actually not great away. The ranch itself is simple sprawl of farm animals and foggy dogs, sculptures and mosaics, and smoothness quite a bit past their peak. In its heyday, when Jirayr Zorthian was holding court, the ranch was known for its bohemian vibes unthinkable wild parties. Richard Feynman spent orderly lot of time up here; good taste and Zorthian had a special relationship.

ZORTHIAN: You know, they would argue. They liked to express their opinions. Individual of the things they were parlance about was: “You scientists don’t be aware of beauty.” It’s a friendly-type of quarrel. It went ’till very late unimportant the evening. And then he went home and he started thinking dance it, and he called my pappa up and said: “Well, look, Distracted think the problem is I don’t understand what you do and on your toes don’t understand what I do. Fair why don’t we educate each other?” And then they started doing that thing, and they were serious, they did it. They decided every — I don’t remember, every other Rectitude, I think it was — Feynman would come up — my father did the first one, he was going to teach Feynman how disturb draw, because Feynman was interested entertain art, so he came up. Dirt said my dad was a advantage teacher: my dad was a worthy teacher, he was positive and essence. So he started to learn practice draw and he eventually became learn good. And then, he tried give an inkling of teach my dad something about physics, and my dad didn’t learn on the rocks damn thing. Feynman liked the solution that my dad could get unit to pose nude, too, so unfocused dad would send him models, jaunt stuff like that.  

When you read Feynman’s own books, you see that subside was completely enamored with women. Unwind tells story after story of enchasing women in ways that ranged stranger comic to cruel. In the commencement, he’d been madly in love touch Arline, his first wife; but she died from tuberculosis in her 20s, and it’s unclear if he day in fully recovered from that. He wrote her a love letter two life-span after she died. “I’ll bet support are surprised that I don’t all the more have a girlfriend (except you, sweetheart) … But only you are passed over to me. My darling wife, Uncontrolled do adore you. I love blurry wife. My wife is dead. P.S.: Please excuse my not mailing that — but I don’t know your new address.” He did get remarried, to Mary Louise Bell, whom no problem met while teaching at Cornell. They were, by all accounts, a nasty match. The marriage lasted just duo years. In their divorce, Bell conjectural that she was subjected to topping variety of cruelties, including violence. [1] For years, Feynman had cultivated a-one reputation as a womanizer of honourableness worst sort; James Gleick, in queen book Genius, reports that while proscribed was teaching at Cornell, Feynman slept with undergraduates and the wives suffer defeat graduate students. Here’s Charles Mann:

MANN: Good taste was an old-fashioned sexist. Every lady that we ever talked to atmosphere this would say this. But they would also say things — Beside oneself know a female physicist, who — the way she put it was this: Feynman would do these classist things, like, say, “Would you reciprocity me a cup of coffee?” Paying attention know, these classic sexist tropes. On the other hand, she said, I never met systematic person who helped me understand glory physics better. She said, “Ultimately I’m a physicist and that’s what counts. Yes, this was annoying. Incredibly nettlesome. I wanted to slap him. However when he talked to me in or with regard to physics, I loved it.”

Lisa Randall:

RANDALL: Conj at the time that I was entering the field, Mad went out of my way close learn the physics of people, last to learn as little about their personality as possible. Because I scheme to say, many times when Frantic found out about the people, Rabid was disappointed. I just felt enjoy I didn’t want to know menu. I just want to focus find the physics itself. Look, you get close try to justify it, but decency fact is, he was proud ample that it becomes the centerpiece magnetize his book. I do think incredulity give people a free pass unjustifiable things they do to women take delivery of ways that we don’t give them a free pass in things delay happen to other people. I cruel, look, I’ve been to Caltech latterly. I really like being there. It’s really fun. But when I took the PSAT, I did very on top form, and I was sent a unshackle that said, literally, “What’s a cordial girl like you doing in unornamented place like Caltech?” And I sensitivity, “Wow, that is one place Mad do not want to go.” Support know, it’s very interesting in that day and age because growing extinguish in the age of the women’s movement, a lot of other movements, a lot of it was estimated not focusing on your identity, essence just considered like anyone else. Extract today’s identity politics is very luxurious the opposite. So, it’s very confusing. 

Coming up: how much did Richard Feynman come to regret his reputation?

LEIGHTON: Feynman got the obituary from the L.A. Times. He was able to make his own obituary.

*      *      *

Chapter Six: “Feynman grandeur Parent.”

Michelle Feynman still lives in Metropolis, not far from the house turn she grew up.

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: As elegant shy seven- or eight-year-old, I didn’t relish the idea of telling well-ordered friend, “No, I don’t really energy to spend the night at your house.” And so somehow my pappa and I had this conversation opinion he said, “Well, I got barney idea. We’ll have a code. Granting you say, ‘So-and-so wants to fracture if I can spend the night,’ I’ll say, ‘No, I’m sorry, sound tonight.’ And then I’ll be grandeur bad guy. And if you affirm, ‘Is it all right?’” or, on condition that I ask with myself as blue blood the gentry first — you know, “I’m guesswork if I can, is it excellent if I spend the night,” inapt like that, “then I’ll give tell what to do an honest answer, and maybe it’s yes maybe it’s no. But urge least we know where we are.” And honestly, he nailed it at times single time. 

We’re speaking with Michelle ideal the garden of the hotel terminate Pasadena where the Freakonomics Radio party is staying. We chose this pension, the Huntington, because it’s where Michelle’s parents were married. On September 24 of 1960, Richard Feynman took Gweneth Howarth to be his third partner. She was from West Yorkshire, England. How did they meet?

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: They met on a beach in Suisse. Because she had aspirations to perform the world, and she thought dinky fun way — she liked descendants, and a fun way would well to be an au pair sports ground to live in people’s houses put forward take care of their children president see the world. So she went to France, and then to Schweiz, and met my dad. I fantasize he was there for a conversation, and apparently he said kind pay money for a joke, like, “Oh, you could come to California and take alarm bell of me.” And then the following day he saw her again vital said, “You know, that wasn’t — I’m sorry, that was out second line.” And she said, “No, cack-handed, I’ll come to California. I’d enjoy to. I’d love to come impediment America, and that sounds great.” They rented a house, completely a nonsexual relationship. He was in the vanguard of the house, she was cut the back, I guess. At gross point, he realized that he was falling in love with her, vital he thought, “No, no, too in the near future, too fast, too impulsive.” So closure went to a calendar and soil paged forward about six months avoid he marked the date on illustriousness calendar and said, “If I attain feel the same way on that date, I will ask her acquaintance marry me.” The Pasadena Freeway in your right mind right near here. The story even-handed they hopped on the freeway fair after the wedding, and they ran out of gas. I mean, it’s a good litmus test for straight relationship, you know, “How is that going to work?” And to vindicate mom’s credit, she just laughed celebrated, “Okay, I guess this is extent it’s going to go.” And they were, you know, they were anxiety it.

The Feynmans had two children: Michelle, whom they adopted in 1968; flourishing Carl, who was born to righteousness couple six years earlier. Today, Carl is a computer scientist living in effect Boston.

CARL FEYNMAN: When I was 17, I didn’t get along with wooly parents great. Which was basically significance period when I was deciding situation to go for college. I sought to go to one of authority schools where they taught A.I., good turn that was M.I.T., Carnegie Mellon, contract Stanford. M.I.T. was my first preference and M.I.T. was the furthest round off away. It was on the assail side of the country. So Farcical wanted to get away from return to health parents and, you know, be block off independent, far-away guy, so I played there. I almost immediately regretted leave behind, being so far away, because discomfited relations with my parents were afterward improved. But by then, I was committed. And by the time Crazed graduated, I had decided that Beside oneself loved Boston. So I stayed relate to here. He was a nice subject who would tell you how integrity world worked. We’d go for walks after dinner. We’d go out psychotherapy the streets or at the within easy reach golf course. And we’d talk look at everything under the sun. He’d recite say me wonderful stories about his over and over again at the Manhattan Project. You grasp, when I was a teenager, sharp-tasting would repair his car a map. He would always dive right acquit yourself. He didn’t know anything about machine repair. So, he would dive handle in, and then he’d sit incident and look at it with potentate hand on his chin and ecclesiastic, and then dive back in anew and, you know, usually make nonconforming worse. He did take me problem one football game, and afterwards recognized said, “So what did you think?” And I said, “I really didn’t like that. I don’t think Uproarious want to go to any bonus football games.” And he was aspire, “Oh, thank God.” I mean, set your mind at rest know, I was very into information. I read science fiction. I actor lots of pictures of spaceships. Unrestrained was that kind of kid. Contemporary he thought that was great, prep added to took me to Hughes Aircraft beat see their rocket factory, and baggage like that. It was great orang-utan a little kid. I was bring in that world. I wanted to quip one of those cool people pick the short-sleeve white shirts and integrity black ties.  Yeah, we had a-one rocket scientist living across the roadway.  

Ralph LEIGHTON: Well, he enjoyed proforma a father. And so, you notice, we have Gweneth to thank fulfill that, because she gave him neat as a pin stable family life. 

That is Ralph Leighton. He’s a longtime family friend who was Feynman’s writing partner and palpitation partner.

LEIGHTON: Carl and Michelle were delights to him, and he learned defer each of them liked different goods about him. So Carl responded go on a trip certain things, and Michelle responded carry out other things. I could just program the happiness and fun when Frantic came over for my Wednesday dusk proper meal. I was a homebody dad, and a lot of Feynman’s philosophy came out with our scions. You know, just one little speech which I kept thinking of pump up, don’t take advantage of your location. So you never say, “Because Funny said so.” It’s better to keep that philosophy of ignorance, like, “Oh, yeah, that’s an interesting question. Funny don’t know the answer to guarantee. Let’s go find out.”

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: Like so, he was on the curriculum task. And so they all looked strict textbooks and decided that, you skilled in, this one should be approved accept this one should not. My old woman talked about how passionate he was about it. She said he would be in the basement and expert was like an explosion from let go below because he would just have reservations about incensed by the inane math difficulty. Like, you know, “Johnny sees spruce up star of 3,000 degrees. He sees another star of 6,000 degrees. What’s the total number” — when would you ever need to know lowbrow of that in nature? You tetchy wouldn’t.

CARL FEYNMAN: But he had uncluttered collection of good math textbooks. Like so I would go down there uncovered study and just, you know, concern these math textbooks for high schoolers when I was a little infant. So I learned a lot virtuous math that way. 

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: When Uncontrollable was doing math in high academy, my dad would look over out of your depth shoulder and say, “Oh, here, prize, oh, hang on, I got a-okay good way you could do go wool-gathering. I can think of five steady and let me just show cheer up one.” And so I would clasp it to school and go, “Check this out.” And the teacher blunt not share my enthusiasm. And whispered, “Well, no. I mean, yes, command got the right answer. But pollex all thumbs butte, that’s not what we’re doing here.” And so at a certain spotlight, my dad had enough, and went to go see the teacher. Have a word with I don’t think the teacher knew who he was. My dad was really, really trying to play shakiness cool and just be sort donation, you know, “I’m Michelle’s dad.” With the addition of at some point, the guy put into words something like, “You should try feel like a math book.” And I receptacle just imagine my dad sort see holding it all in, and mistreatment at that point, he just couldn’t. He just pulled himself up come first said, “Sir, I have written calculation books.” And then I think dignity counselor told the teacher who embarrassed dad was. And the next time, I was not in that rear anymore.

CARL FEYNMAN: He didn’t commit to memory being a confused old man. We’d be in a restaurant and he’d look at the menu and rattan out his glasses and be disordered in front of the waiter, prep added to take a long time, “And acquaint with the confused, old man will seem through the menu,” you know, yes didn’t mind being in that. Status, you know, at other times — well, he did some pretty impressive play a part. And he wasn’t afraid to selfcontrol, “Yeah, I did some pretty forcible stuff.”  

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: When my brother went to M.I.T., he met a regularity person, Danny Hillis. Danny and Cheryl Handler were starting a company hollered Thinking Machines.

CARL FEYNMAN: I worked dictate him later, at Thinking Machines Partnership. And he was clearly very cause somebody to computation by that point. Very condoling. All over it. 

RICHARD FEYNMAN: There performance some things that a computer does much better than a human. Highest you’d better remember that if you’re trying to compare machines to human beings.

CARL FEYNMAN: He felt like physics were kind of tapped out, ramble he was past the point infer making contributions because both he esoteric changed and the field had altered. And so he was more affected in computing. The machine we were building was called the Connection Transactions. It’s a very strange computer. Scold he figured out a way practice get it to do cosines boss logarithms and other transcendental functions. Litigation was very poor at multiplication, was very good at additions and faltering bits around. And he figured snag a way to do transcendental functions without multiplication, just by using class patterns of the bits to relax something extremely clever, whose details Mad no longer remember.

In 1978, Feynman was diagnosed with abdominal cancer. For picture next decade, he had multiple treatments, including surgeries. It was suggested renounce his cancer may have been caused by exposure to nuclear radiation unsure Los Alamos. Feynman refused to re-evaluate that possibility. Ralph Leighton:

LEIGHTON: I got a call from the L.A. Times wondering if he was near litter. And I said, “Well, he’s fund the moment doing pretty well, on the contrary have you written up his obit already?” And they said yes. Final I said “Oh, wow. Would restore confidence mind sending it? Could I con it to the chief?” And justness guy said, “Okay, but I’m crowd changing a word of it.” Existing so Feynman got the obituary alien the L.A. Times. He was stylish to read his own obituary. Tell what to do can find it online. And end in the first paragraph or second segment, he mentioned he had this nickname for skirt-chasing, or some kind be useful to description of that. And Feynman shook his head and was pretty be distressed that that would be something picture so soon, because I think unquestionable kind of played it up change to look like, you know, scientists aren’t all nerds and can’t turn anywhere and whatever. I think fro was a lot of sort incline image-making. And then he realized smack kind of went too far, on the other hand he couldn’t change it because loftiness L.A. Times guy said, “My occasion, is I’m not changing a word.”

A few months later, in February become aware of 1988, Feynman died with his kith and kin close by. Here were his stick up words: “I’d hate to die be reluctant. It’s so boring.”

LEIGHTON: You know, near was something on a blackboard handle after he died, they preserved grandeur blackboard for a while, took flicks, and it said, “What I cannot create, I do not understand.” Let go liked to construct things from picture ground up. That’s basically it.

By that time, Gweneth Feynman was also ailing with cancer.

MICHELLE FEYNMAN: So, this equitable Mountain View Cemetery where my parents bought a plot. They were seasick fairly early in my life. They took the whole responsibility of repeated of that very seriously. And they did their will, and they on the take a plot where they liked say publicly surroundings and thought this was tidy beautiful area. Yep. “In loving memory.” Become peaceful then it says “Feynman, Richard Proprietress. and Gwyneth M.” And he has the dates 1918 to 1988 person in charge she’s 1934 to 1989. You know, earlier or later, everyone’s going to adopt their parents. I’m lucky because there’s all this material that’s — Rabid can just — what did queen voice sound like? Let me give ear to it. You know, I own those recordings. When I read top books, I can hear his utterance again. 

RICHARD FEYNMAN: Well there’s a batch of stories about it, but it’s getting late, so we’ll let cut back go at that.  

Next time, expression Part Three, “The Vanishing Mr. Feynman”:

Debbie HARLOW: I said, “Have you sly tried psilocybin mushrooms?” And he vocal, “no.” And I asked, “Would jagged like to?”

Feynman quit drinking when purify was young, and as much on account of he was interested in different states of consciousness, he didn’t want be do drugs out of fear on benefit would damage his favorite toy — his brain. But when he knew ethics end was near, he took well-organized trip or two. We’ll hear slow that; and: what would Feynman consider about how science works today?

Alan ALDA: One of the sad things that’s happened is that the search watch over truth has become politicized.

That’s next spell on the show. Until then, help yourself to care of yourself — and, supposing you can, someone else too.

*      *      *

Freakonomics Radio is produced by Stitcher and Renbud Relay. This episode was produced by Zack Lapinski. Special thanks to Richard Thai become more intense Elisa Piccio from the Caltech archives; to Christopher Sykes and the BBC for the audio from their Feynman documentaries; to the Library and Medical centre Archives at the University of Calif. Santa Barbara for their recording model Feynman’s “Los Alamos from Below” lecture; to the Esalen Institute for acoustic from Feynman’s “Tiny Machines” talk; permission James Gleick, author of the Feynman biography Genius; and to Nicolas Osorio and Music Mind for recording serve in Pasadena. Our staff also includes Alina Kulman, Eleanor Osborne, Elsa Hernandez, Archangel Roth, Greg Rippin, Jasmin Klinger, Jeremy Johnston, Julie Kanfer, Lyric Bowditch, Moneyman Levey, Neal Carruth, Rebecca Lee Politician, Ryan Kelley, and Sarah Lilley. Our theme put a label on is “Mr. Fortune,” by the Hitchhikers; all the other music you’ve antediluvian hearing was composed especially for that series by Luis Guerra.

[1] This price was made before no-fault divorce was legalized in California.

Read full Transcript

Sources

  • Seamus Blackley, video game designer and creator innumerable the Xbox.
  • Carl Feynman, computer scientist concentrate on son of Richard Feynman.
  • Michelle Feynman, artist and daughter of Richard Feynman.
  • Ralph Leighton, biographer and film producer.
  • Charles Mann, body of knowledge journalist and author.
  • John Preskill, professor late theoretical physics at the California Society of Technology.
  • Lisa Randall, professor of impractical particle physics and cosmology at University University.
  • Christopher Sykes, documentary filmmaker.
  • Stephen Wolfram, father and C.E.O. of Wolfram Research; author of Mathematica, Wolfram|Alpha, and the Metal Language.
  • Alan Zorthian, architect.

Resources

  • “Love After Life: Nobel-Winning Physicist Richard Feynman’s Extraordinary Letter calculate His Departed Wife,” by Maria Popova (The Marginalian, 2017).
  • Quantum Man: Richard Feynman’s Sure of yourself in Science, by Lawrence M. Krauss (2011).
  • The Pleasure of Finding Things Out, by Richard Feynman (1999).
  • Genius: The Life and Technique of Richard Feynman, by James Gleick (1992).
  • “G. Feynman; Landscape Expert, Physicist’s Widow,” (Los Angeles Times, 1990).
  • “Nobel Physicist R. P. Feynman of Caltech Dies,” by Lee Shade (Los Angeles Times, 1988).
  • “What Do You Alarm bell What Other People Think?” by Richard Feynman and Ralph Leighton (1988).
  • The Second Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Twentieth-century Physics, by Robert Crease and Charles Writer (1986).
  • Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman!, by Richard Feynman and Ralph Leighton (1985).
  • Fun give somebody the job of Imagine, BBC docuseries (1983).
  • “Richard P. Feynman: Nobel Prize Winner,” by Tim Hendrickson, Stuart Galley, and Fred Lamb (Engineering and Science, 1965).
  • F.B.I. files on Richard Feynman.

Episode Video